From the 17 November 2008 Lockport Union Sun and Journal (Lockport, NY)

By Bob Confer

Youíd be hard pressed to find someone who supported the $700B bailout of Wall Street. Most folks were up in arms over how taxpayer money Ė our money! - was used to reward Wall Streetís excesses and bad behavior. This ire, which was shared by pretty much everyone except for Congress and Wall Streetís bigwigs, was well-intentioned and a real breath of fresh air. It was nice to finally see so many people that upset with Big Government.

Even so, I canít help but to walk away from that uprising with a sense of pessimism directed towards the masses. I have to feel that way when I see how selective they have been with their criticism of 2008ís ongoing "New New Deal". Where were the critics when Uncle Sam issued the economic stimulus checks? Where were the naysayers when we covered homeownersí bad mortgage decisions? Why didnít the media throw a temper tantrum over the governmentís buyout of AIG or its cash infusion to the banks?

Itís all because people are mad only when itís convenient for them. Their anger, their resentment, surfaces only when itís not they or their interests who are at the financial feeding trough. Because of that selectivity, the federal government has run roughshod over our economy, making FDRís historic efforts look almost pedestrian. By focusing only on the aforementioned $700 bailout, the media and citizens of our nation have virtually ignored the cornucopia of bailouts, buyouts, stimuli, infusions, loans and the like bestowed upon us the past six months. So far this year Uncle Sam has doled out $2.950 trillion of those giveaways and we still have a long ways to go before the economy can even begin to be healthy. Without the masses pulling tightly on the checkrein, the fed will no doubt feel obligated to issue more rescue plans which might include the salvation of credit card debtors (card debt now stands at $970 billion) or the confiscation of 401k accounts.

Nothing is out of the question unless we make a stand now. The line has to be drawn somewhere, sometime, somehow. There is no better place to start than the next item on the governmentís things-to-do list: the bailout of the US auto industry.

As I was writing this column top level officials were still debating what to do to save the industry, specifically General Motors. GM was fearful that come December it would be totally out of cash and bankruptcy would occur. Based on recent history, giving them a bailout would be something akin to giving the keys for the liquor store to the alcoholic who says heís learned self-control. By believing the loser youíre only feeding his bad habits and guaranteeing his death.

GMís woes were brought on by its addiction to operating under sales techniques that were developed by manufacturers in the 1800ís and have been obsolete since. Back in the day, manufacturers would build to supply and not to demand, more or less dictating what the consumer would buy. Back then, the manufacturer defined the market. Nowadays, with so many choices available, the consumer defines the market and the manufacturer adjusts accordingly. GM hasnít adjusted and is still making vehicles that the consumers donít want, hence its cash flow problems: GM canít sell that which it has made. Ignorant to ongoing fuel scare issues that have been with us since the 1970ís and oblivious to the burgeoning green movement, GM is putting out too many trucks and SUVís, only dabbling in the smaller vehicles that are less expensive or use less energyÖthe very cars that people want and are buying from the highly-successful new American auto industry (the foreign firms who manufacture on American soil). With GM, itís always too little too late.

Basically, the bailout Ė once again, our money - would only go towards temporarily masking the weaknesses of GMís management. It would give them the cash they need to get through their current financial crisis, but, with the status quo as it is at GM, the taxpayers would never see a return on their loans because of the perpetuation of bad business practices.

The same criticism was said of Wall Street. Yet, because of how beloved the auto industry is, there are very few people who will levy those charges against GM. Even so, there are fewer people who will say with confidence that GM is doing the things necessary to change its ways. Itís destined to die, whether itís December 2008 or December 2011. The bailout will be but an investment in that demise, the government rewarding bad behavior, just as it did on Wall Street.